BunkerWebvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 11 134 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with