# BunkerWeb vs Shields

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BunkerWeb | Shields |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 11 136 | 27 331 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +125 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Shields scores 80/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.

BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.

If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.

## Details

- [BunkerWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb.md)
- [Shields](https://selfhost.directory/project/shields) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shields.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bunkerweb-vs-shields