BunkerWebvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 11 133 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with