# BunkerWeb vs Pterodactyl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BunkerWeb | Pterodactyl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #4 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 11 135 ✓ | 9 438 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +183 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.

Pterodactyl ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.

If you want the quickest setup, BunkerWeb is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.

## Details

- [BunkerWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb.md)
- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bunkerweb-vs-pterodactyl