BunkerWebvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 11 138 | 27 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with