BunkerWebvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 11 134 | 61 536 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | +492 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with