BunkerWebvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 138 | 40 372 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
BunkerWeb details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with