BunkerWebvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 11 138 | 15 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, BunkerWeb is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →PeerTube details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep PeerTube, compare it with