# BunkerWeb vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BunkerWeb | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 136 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

BunkerWeb scores 71/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.

BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BunkerWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bunkerweb-vs-openreader