# BunkerWeb vs docker-pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BunkerWeb | docker-pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 11 133 | 11 728 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 ✓ | +115 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.

## Details

- [BunkerWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb.md)
- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bunkerweb-vs-docker-pi-hole