# Buildarr vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted [Configuration Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/configuration-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Buildarr | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 378 | 12 826 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 48/100 for Buildarr, so it is the safer default.

zookeeper is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Buildarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/buildarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/buildarr.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/buildarr-vs-zookeeper