# budibase vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 28 367 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

budibase is growing faster right now (+67 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s