# budibase vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 ✓ | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 31 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP).

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap