# budibase vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 ✓ | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +156 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-workout-cool