# budibase vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 ✓ | 17 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +491 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Wazuh scores 80/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.

If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

Wazuh is growing faster right now (+491 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-wazuh