# budibase vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +199 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 33 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Warpgate scores 75/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Warpgate.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-warpgate