# budibase vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

budibase is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-uusec-waf