# budibase vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 | 117 848 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +5 489 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-tradingagents