# budibase vs static_status

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | static_status |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 ✓ | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.

If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

budibase is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [static_status](https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-static-status