# budibase vs Semaphore UI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Semaphore UI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 28 367 ✓ | 14 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +149 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Semaphore UI, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Semaphore UI.

If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

Semaphore UI is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Semaphore UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-semaphore-ui