# budibase vs ScreenTinker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | ScreenTinker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 28 367 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ScreenTinker.

budibase is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-screentinker