# budibase vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 28 367 | 35 507 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +1 775 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase and RustFS score the same (74/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 775 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-rustfs