# budibase vs Pinchflat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Pinchflat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #13 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 368 ✓ | 5 431 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 ✓ | +61 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 65/100 for Pinchflat, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pinchflat.

If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Pinchflat](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-pinchflat