# budibase vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 28 367 ✓ | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +257 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-octobot