# budibase vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 368 | 46 471 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +1 327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-mitmproxy