# budibase vs MCSManager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | MCSManager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 ✓ | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for MCSManager.

If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-mcsmanager