# budibase vs MacOS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | MacOS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 28 368 ✓ | 21 693 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +116 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

MacOS scores 76/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MacOS.

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [MacOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/macos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/macos.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-macos