# budibase vs LubeLogger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | LubeLogger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 367 ✓ | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +69 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-lubelogger