# budibase vs Infisical

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 368 | 30 127 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +711 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 79 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Infisical scores 78/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 75 for budibase.

If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-infisical