# budibase vs Incus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Incus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 363 ✓ | 6 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +275 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Incus scores 75/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Incus.

If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

Incus is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-incus