# budibase vs html2rss

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | html2rss |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #27 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 28 367 ✓ | 194 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.14.5 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 50/100 for html2rss, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for html2rss.

budibase is growing faster right now (+67 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [html2rss](https://selfhost.directory/project/html2rss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/html2rss.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-html2rss