# budibase vs Fish Speech

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | budibase | Fish Speech |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 | 33 455 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +132 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)
- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/budibase-vs-fish-speech