# BTCPay Server vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BTCPay Server | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in E-commerce | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 7 861 ✓ | 2 922 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +120 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

BTCPay Server scores 76/100 against 64/100 for Zot Registry, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for BTCPay Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; BTCPay Server needs more configuration.

## Details

- [BTCPay Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/btcpay-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/btcpay-server.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/btcpay-server-vs-zot-registry