# BTCPay Server vs Prysm

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BTCPay Server | Prysm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in E-commerce | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 7 861 ✓ | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

BTCPay Server scores 76/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.

BTCPay Server is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BTCPay Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/btcpay-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/btcpay-server.md)
- [Prysm](https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/btcpay-server-vs-prysm