# BTCPay Server vs MedusaJs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BTCPay Server | MedusaJs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in E-commerce | #1 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 7 861 | 36 989 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +538 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 76/100 for BTCPay Server, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for BTCPay Server.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BTCPay Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/btcpay-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/btcpay-server.md)
- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/btcpay-server-vs-medusajs