# Lightpanda vs youtube-dl-nas

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lightpanda | youtube-dl-nas |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 37 452 ✓ | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +651 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Zig | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; youtube-dl-nas needs more configuration.

Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+651 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lightpanda](https://selfhost.directory/project/browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/browser.md)
- [youtube-dl-nas](https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/browser-vs-youtube-dl-nas