# Lightpanda vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lightpanda | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 37 144 ✓ | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +343 ✓ | +161 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Zig | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+343 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lightpanda](https://selfhost.directory/project/browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/browser.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/browser-vs-woodpecker-ci