# Lightpanda vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lightpanda | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 37 100 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +299 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Zig | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Lightpanda ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lightpanda](https://selfhost.directory/project/browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/browser.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/browser-vs-windows-arm