Lightpandavswebarchive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lightpanda | webarchive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #11 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation |
| GitHub stars | 37 258 | 200 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +457 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Zig | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 40/100 for webarchive, so it is the safer default.
Lightpanda ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for webarchive.
If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; webarchive needs more configuration.
Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+457 stars in 30 days).
Lightpanda details →webarchive details →
Swap a project
Keep Lightpanda, compare it with
Keep webarchive, compare it with