# Lightpanda vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lightpanda | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 37 258 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +457 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Zig | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

Lightpanda ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lightpanda](https://selfhost.directory/project/browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/browser.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/browser-vs-uncompressed