# Lightpanda vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lightpanda | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 37 205 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +404 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Zig | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Lightpanda ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+404 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lightpanda](https://selfhost.directory/project/browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/browser.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/browser-vs-tube-archivist