# Lightpanda vs Traffic Source

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lightpanda | Traffic Source |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 37 205 ✓ | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +404 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Zig | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.

Lightpanda ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.

If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.

Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+404 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lightpanda](https://selfhost.directory/project/browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/browser.md)
- [Traffic Source](https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/browser-vs-traffic-source