# Broccoli OSS vs DeepSeek Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Broccoli OSS | DeepSeek Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 10 in AI Automation | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 283 | 264 906 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +8 914 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 26 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 47/100 for Broccoli OSS, so it is the safer default.

Broccoli OSS ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Broccoli OSS needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Broccoli OSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/broccoli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/broccoli.md)
- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/broccoli-vs-deepseek-harness