# broadlink-mqtt vs ntfy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | broadlink-mqtt | ntfy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #80 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 19 in Notifications |
| GitHub stars | 238 | 35 134 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +736 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.34.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ntfy scores 85/100 against 44/100 for broadlink-mqtt, so it is the safer default.

ntfy ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for broadlink-mqtt.

If you want the quickest setup, ntfy is easier to run; broadlink-mqtt needs more configuration.

ntfy is growing faster right now (+736 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [broadlink-mqtt](https://selfhost.directory/project/broadlink-mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/broadlink-mqtt.md)
- [ntfy](https://selfhost.directory/project/ntfy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ntfy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/broadlink-mqtt-vs-ntfy