brightbean-studiovsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| brightbean-studio | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Social Media Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 2 595 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 60/100 for brightbean-studio, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for brightbean-studio.
If you want the quickest setup, brightbean-studio is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
brightbean-studio is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).
brightbean-studio details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep brightbean-studio, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with