# brightbean-studio vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | brightbean-studio | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Social Media Management | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 594 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +224 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero-K scores 62/100 against 60/100 for brightbean-studio, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; brightbean-studio needs more configuration.

brightbean-studio is growing faster right now (+224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [brightbean-studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/brightbean-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/brightbean-studio.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/brightbean-studio-vs-zero-k