brightbean-studiovsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| brightbean-studio | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Social Media Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 594 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 60/100 for brightbean-studio, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, brightbean-studio is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
brightbean-studio is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).
brightbean-studio details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep brightbean-studio, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with