brightbean-studiovsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| brightbean-studio | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Social Media Management | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 2 594 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
brightbean-studio scores 60/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.
Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for brightbean-studio.
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; brightbean-studio needs more configuration.
brightbean-studio is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).
brightbean-studio details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →
Swap a project
Keep brightbean-studio, compare it with
Keep Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), compare it with