# brightbean-studio vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | brightbean-studio | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Social Media Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 595 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

brightbean-studio scores 60/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for brightbean-studio.

If you want the quickest setup, brightbean-studio is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

brightbean-studio is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [brightbean-studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/brightbean-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/brightbean-studio.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/brightbean-studio-vs-wraft