# botwave vs piped

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | botwave | piped |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 14 in Audio Streaming | #1 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 10 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.13-ostodes · 11 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Vue |

## Which one should you pick?

piped scores 70/100 against 47/100 for botwave, so it is the safer default.

botwave ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for piped.

If you want the quickest setup, piped is easier to run; botwave needs more configuration.

piped is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [botwave](https://selfhost.directory/project/botwave) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/botwave.md)
- [piped](https://selfhost.directory/project/piped) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piped.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/botwave-vs-piped